51Testing软件测试论坛

 找回密码
 (注-册)加入51Testing

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

微信登录,快人一步

手机号码,快捷登录

查看: 2597|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论] [junit] Future of testing tools

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    奋斗
    2022-7-13 15:22
  • 签到天数: 1 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]测试小兵

    跳转到指定楼层
    1#
    发表于 2007-2-9 09:17:43 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
    All,

    At the Agile Open Northwest conference I held an open space session on the
    future of testing tools. I expected to talk a little about Theories and
    assertThat, but we ended up having a wide-ranging discussion about a variety
    of topics. I mind-mapped the result and put in on the conference wiki:

    http://www.agileopennorthwest.co ... FutureOfUnitTesting

    The most surprising result to me was the interest in language features for
    testing-what would a language look like that included double-checking as a
    first-class concept? I was also surprised at how much commonality there was
    between the unit and functional testing "vendors", that reporting is a big
    issue for everyone.

    One thing missing from the discussion was much talk about the hopes and
    dreams of users, so I thought I would open up the question here. What is it
    you wish your testing tool would do for you that it doesn't?

    Cheers,

    Kent Beck

    Three Rivers Institute

    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    分享到:  QQ好友和群QQ好友和群 QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友
    收藏收藏
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    该用户从未签到

    2#
    发表于 2007-2-13 09:42:11 | 只看该作者
    鼓励一下
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

    本版积分规则

    关闭

    站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

    小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|51Testing软件测试网 ( 沪ICP备05003035号 关于我们

    GMT+8, 2024-11-23 02:56 , Processed in 0.063887 second(s), 25 queries .

    Powered by Discuz! X3.2

    © 2001-2024 Comsenz Inc.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表