51Testing软件测试论坛

 找回密码
 (注-册)加入51Testing

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

微信登录,快人一步

手机号码,快捷登录

查看: 1790|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原创] Are you sure you want to use QTP?

[复制链接]

该用户从未签到

跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2010-8-21 19:41:58 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
More often than not, I have seen people going for test automation just because they want to go for this exciting buzzword. It is generally realized in the very end that automation has not given intended returns.I would suggest that before even thinking of Automation a thorough study of your application/system/module should be performed.

The following types of test cases are preferred (but not limited to) choice for automation:



Tests that need to run for every build.
Tests that use multiple data values for same action.
Identical tests that need to be executed using different browsers

The following types are not considered to be the good candidates for automation:


Test Cases that will only be executed once.
Test Cases used for Ad-hoc/random Testing.
Test Cases that are infrequently selected for execution.
Test Cases that will require manual intervention ie a task not possible to automate.
The most imp. one--based on the intuition and knowledge of application. Eg. if you find that you cannot escape from manual intervention.


Above all the effort required to develop and maintain the automated scripts should be weighed against the resources (no of hours, budget) that task would take while manual execution. The amount of changes the application undergoes from one build to another should also be taken into account while choosing for test automation.

If an app undergoes drastic changes that means most time will be exhausted in maintaining the scripts. These apps are then considered bad choice for automation.
Considering the above points Return On Investment (ROI) should be calculated and this should be the single most important criterion while going for Test Automation.
分享到:  QQ好友和群QQ好友和群 QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友
收藏收藏
回复

使用道具 举报

该用户从未签到

2#
发表于 2010-8-22 21:47:22 | 只看该作者
不错,自动化测试的思想有时候比工具更重要
http://www.cnblogs.com/testware/archive/2010/07/01/1769092.html
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

该用户从未签到

3#
发表于 2010-8-23 13:29:01 | 只看该作者
题目和内容有点不符
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|51Testing软件测试网 ( 沪ICP备05003035号 关于我们

GMT+8, 2024-11-13 14:26 , Processed in 0.068625 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2024 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表