51Testing软件测试论坛

 找回密码
 (注-册)加入51Testing

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

微信登录,快人一步

手机号码,快捷登录

查看: 2054|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

When Should a Test Be Automated? 15

[复制链接]

该用户从未签到

跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2006-1-10 12:36:42 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Brian Marick

Testing Foundations
marick@testing.com


Changes to the intervening code

The intervening code is a major cause of test death. That’s especially true when it’s a graphical user interface as opposed to, say, a textual interface or the interface to some standard hardware device. For example, suppose the user interface once required you to type in the phone number. But it’s now changed to provide a visual representation of a phone keypad. You now click on the numbers with a mouse, simulating the use of a real phone. (A really stupid idea, but weirder things have happened.) Both interfaces deliver exactly the same data to the code under test, but the UI change is likely to break an automated test, which no longer has any place to "type" the phone number.
分享到:  QQ好友和群QQ好友和群 QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友
收藏收藏
回复

使用道具 举报

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|51Testing软件测试网 ( 沪ICP备05003035号 关于我们

GMT+8, 2024-11-26 22:51 , Processed in 0.070237 second(s), 29 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2024 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表