51Testing软件测试论坛

 找回密码
 (注-册)加入51Testing

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

微信登录,快人一步

手机号码,快捷登录

查看: 2399|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

国外测友对规格的新认识

[复制链接]

该用户从未签到

跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2005-11-8 00:36:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
A thought, inspired by the CSS2 specification

Specifications are a tool for resolving disputes. They are not a communication or teaching tool.
Sentences in a specification are the tangible and checkable evidence that a dispute among specifiers has been resolved. The specification is also used as strong evidence when two programmers have an implementation dispute, or when a tester and a programmer do. But almost no one, given the option, would choose to learn CSS by reading the specification.

That suggests that a specification should not be written to a consistent level of precision. Precision is needed only where disputes have already occurred or are likely. You can be happy when politics and economics allow you to let all precision be driven by actual, rather than anticipated, disputes.

具体链接见http://www.testing.com/cgi-bin/b ... pecification-slogan
大致意思就是说规格是用来解决分歧和争端的,而不是用来沟通的,所以规格没必要什么都写的很精确,只要把有分歧的地方写清楚就可以了,把大家最终达成一致的东西记录下来,一旦再出现分歧,就再去修改规格,记录讨论的结果,不知道大家怎么看。
分享到:  QQ好友和群QQ好友和群 QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友
收藏收藏
回复

使用道具 举报

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|51Testing软件测试网 ( 沪ICP备05003035号 关于我们

GMT+8, 2024-11-23 11:15 , Processed in 0.066976 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2024 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表